Life here has sort of settled down, and even though work can be quite hectic and discouraging at times, my daily routine is rather boring. I do not have much to report other than nearly colliding with a huge SUV in a parking lot (not my fault) and crashing a tuk-tuk (entirely my fault) in the space of two days. My days in the afternoons are rather boring and I spend a lot of time investigating life however one wants to define it. Below are latest of my contemplations, reminiscences and general ruminations…
My gran is a very simple and humble person now in her eighties. She received only basic education in a German school during WWII and her jobs in life were simple and many required physical work. She led a simple and quiet life mainly caring for her family. Her subversive characteristics cannot be undermined though. When she was young lent was something that everybody observed. During that time no meat was consumed and no animal derived products were used. They were all sored in pantries and as she recalls the frying pan was hung on a hook and not used for a few weeks. This is how religion was important to people at that time. But my gran was rather a curious person. She sneaked in to the pantry just before Good Friday and got herself a large chunk of something similar to Scottish Haggis, ate it and waited for God’s Wrath! As you can imagine the god did not budge a finger… She sometimes tells us the story and always laughs at it…
I guess many of us like to put to test the theories we are taught. When I was at school, in my early biology classes, we were still taught that the taste buds on our tongue were arranged in a certain fashion and a particular part of the tongue was responsible for particular flavours. It was one of few facts I remembered from school and was eager to experiment especially that sometimes I had to take medicine that was rather bitter and I hated the taste. So I thought that if I placed it strategically on my tongue so the bitterness would not be detected and swallowed quickly I would cheat the tongue and would not taste the bitterness. How disappointing it was to always fail this! Having tried many times, I did have the fleeting thought that the books were wrong. I kept repeating the experiment with different tastes but the outcome was always disappointing. Somehow though I always managed to persuade myself that I was doing it wrong. I could not question the written word of the books, could I? I did not even share these findings with anyone as I assumed I would be laughed at. After a while I gave it up and forgot all about it until a few years later when I stumbled across some write up somewhere that this theory of structured taste buds was no longer valid! See, a curious kid could prove a theory wrong but because authority has been so much hammered into our heads we would not dare questioning the written word. Now I wonder if any of my teachers had tried this simple test at all, or did they just take it for granted and regurgitated the fossilized rubbish as science? Or did some of them have their doubts but for the sake of their own safety in the job they decided to stop any independent investigations…
I have recently come across ideas that contradict everything that we learn at schools. I cannot say I buy it all but they seem to have some valid points. Now, I am talking about contradicting the VERY fundaments of our knowledge we learn at schools. Simple experiments are carried out and videos posted online and they seem to question all we know. Now, try to imagine that: a few people just like me in my younger age play around and get results significantly different from what is generally thought to be correct. They do it repeatedly! Repeatedly they get consistent results. As they post their findings, the majority is just laughing at them calling them names. I was too scared to even talk about my findings about the taste buds, now the technology makes it possible to share your findings more or less anonymously but the ridicule is still there. Why is it so hard for people to step out of the comfort zone and see for themselves? Majority often say that the minority is so stupid they get everything wrong because science has proven this or that and it is a fact. Yet, the majority is often too lazy to get the real grip on basics of science. Well, if there is a simple experiment to confirm what we question and if it repeatedly confirms that we have solid grounds for doubts, shouldn’t this be investigated seriously rather than just simply mocked?
In year 9 we are discussing the human body now and the respiratory and circulatory systems. The students get amazed when they hear that the lung surface is as large as that of a tennis court, or that our blood vessels have the total length so large that they could go around the earth 2.5 times. I thought it would be a fun thing to make these calculations to see it ourselves. I myself have always taken them for granted so I thought it would be fun to go through the process. When I started my google search to find it, all I got was the numbers simply repeated and taken for granted. Maybe I did the search wrong (silly me again!)? Whenever something more promising regarding the calculating process popped up, before it even introduced the topic, I was asked for the subscription payment. I gave up the whole idea quite frustrated and angry. We repeat these numbers in good will, but they are only empty words if there is no evidence to go with it. I am not saying these numbers are wrong but I simply ask to be shown the calculation method. I might try to find it again when calm down…
Another thing getting me angry is the branding. Many international schools are proud to be Apple schools. This means that all staff and students have Apple devices for their education purposes. The younger ones usually are given ipads, the older one the airbooks. What a clever marketing strategy!
Everybody knows that Apple interface is completely different from any other system. Everybody knows that the habits you develop in your formative years are the hardest to eradicate. So, from a very early age you get used to the Apple way of doing things, you reinforce it daily until you cannot be bothered to go to any other system. You have been sold this system for life! And you are proud to be an Apple user! Well done!
This marketing from birth process has been at work for about a decade now and the results are already visible. The young pupils just love the distraction of ipads. Handwriting is still being taught but in a much lesser capacity. It is worth noting that Ipads rely mainly on screentouching and are not great for typing. Trying to learn to type comes in later when they leave primary, but by then their habits are already formed. I watch many students in secondary schools holding their pens in some ridiculous way that impedes their handwriting. Nobody seems to care about it. Ok, if their ability to hold a pen is superceded by the ability to touchtype then at least they have some skill. But they cannot touchtype properly either! Handwriting is painful for them (physically) so external exams are a horrific prospect! I suspect that writing a few pages of text in English exams in a single stretch of time is probably the first time they have to do this for many of them.
We are starting to steer away from paper textbooks in schools too. It all seems to go online: resources are posted online on school servers or education websites are used directly. Isn’t it a bit suspicious that we are all getting to use all these resources for free? Who is being so kind to us to let use their servers free of charge? Not long in the future I predict all good/useable information will be only accessible online through paid subscription. One day, sooner rather than later, it will all be unavailable unless you pay first.
Only recently have I discovered that there is an agnostic part of the Intelligent Design (ID) movement. I always thought (wrongly) that ID equaled creationism. It turns out than more and more people question both creationism as seen by major religions and evolution. However, the general perception of majority who do not research the field is that it is either god as the creator, or evolution at play when it comes to life origins.
In my education I was exposed to both views and neither made much sense to me. Organised religion repulsed me from the very beginning even though I could not really explain why. When I think of it now, the things I oppose most strongly to are the fear it instigates in people and the idea that you come to this world as a sinner.
Evolution is also a concept I cannot buy. One of the major problems I have with it is sexual reproduction. Let’s assume that macroevolution does happen and results in biodiversity. Sexual reproduction requires two organisms of the same genetic make-up meeting at the same time at the same place. Now, can you imagine how immensely unlikely it is? For the first sexual act ever in the distant history, it means that two separate organisms had to undergo very complex evolution process in the same direction to achieve 100% species compatibility of a male with a female on the way developing fully working opposite sex organs so that they could meet completely by chance and to be successful at producing offspring. But this is not the end of it for we are taught incestuous breeding limits the gene pool creating all sorts of genetic deficiencies in the resulting progeny. How come then that the two initial organisms are able to achieve the genetic variety we see now and that even now with all the variety present close cousins are discouraged from procreating. How is this all logical? But it is never brought up when discussing the subject. Very few questions are asked and it is presented as scientifically sound theory and nobody bothers with the ‘theory’ part of it.
I am not saying I know it all; all I am saying is that I am utterly confused.I suppose this confusion might be generated on purpose for the ‘wiser’ to say that you were not paying attention and that the simplest facts escape you.
I am overly not mathematically gifted, but as long as the numbers stay relatively real I cope ok. However, when the numbers become too large I get lost and I lose interest no longer wanting to investigate anything. The same goes for numbers too small: I just get confused and things stop making sense.
I would say the same is true about any subject: if you convolute any topic badly enough people will become disinterested and will take your word (as the teacher) for anything without any further verification.
Also, based on my personal experience, unless you are really interested in a topic no matter how much a teacher will push you to learn something you will not retain the information. So I find it laughable when the school managers try to push for the crosscurricular links and the interdepartmental planning making teachers work much harder than the students at making learning happen. If students are not devoted to a topic, the teachers can bend backwards but will not achieve results. But we live in a society where blame must be put on someone for unfulfilled goals. It just so happens that teachers have been in schools for so long that they have lost their backbones. It happened because schools are not interested in education but mainly in crowd control.
